Link Parking v Parkinson

County Court case on the primacy of a lease over a parking contract.


There is no evidence before me to suggest that they have in any way undertaken steps to vary the lease, and I am not satisfied on the evidence before me that section 21 applies such that by engaging the company they have applied new and binding regulations on the leaseholders. A mere letter regarding permits would not, in my judgment, suffice in this regard.

Have more questions? Submit a request


Please sign in to leave a comment.
Powered by Zendesk